Veras

Operational knowledge for industrial infrastructure

Investigate operational issues with better context.

Veras connects operational data, procedures, system dependencies, and historical experience into source-backed investigations.

Built for teams that need to move quickly without losing context, evidence, or operational history.

Traceable sources Verify before action Human review
Accepting design partners

Seeking 2–3 design partners with recurring operational investigation problems.

Get in touch

Operators receive alarms, procedures and reports. Understanding what is happening still requires connecting them.

What is my real system status?

An alarm, report, or operator observation is only one signal. The risk may sit in a connected system.

Have we seen this before?

Prior incidents, work orders, shift notes, and operator experience can hold relevant context, but it is usually spread across systems, reports, and people.

What should we verify first?

Veras connects procedures, signals, history, and dependencies so teams can focus verification before taking action.

Veras brings the relevant context forward so teams can decide what to verify next.

Veras turns operational knowledge into investigation-ready context and guidance.

Relevant procedures, operating data, history, and system dependencies are organized into one guided investigation workflow.

Investigation is the first workflow built on the Veras operational knowledge layer.

Faster investigations

Relevant context is organized before teams choose a path.

Fewer wrong first moves

Connected-system risks are surfaced before the team acts.

More complete handovers

Current findings, context, and open checks move with the case.

From alarm to guided investigation.

Example: cooling unit high supply temperature — chilled-water system, industrial facility.

Alarm: Cooling Unit — High Supply Temperature Active

Active signals

Cooling unit supply temperature Rising ↑ WARN
Chilled-water supply flow Falling ↓ WARN
Chilled-water flow-switch Open ALARM
Supply airflow differential Normal OK
Adjacent DX unit trend EXCL.

Leading explanation for review

Chilled-water supply degradation

Sources

Cooling unit manual · chilled-water system manual · site topology · reviewed incident pattern

Context considered

Flow falling · airflow normal · DX trend excluded · reviewed incident pattern

Status

For review, not final cause.

Verification to review

1 Verify chilled-water supply flow rate and flow-switch state
2 Compare chilled-water leaving temperature with cooling unit supply temperature trend
3 Inspect chilled-water hydraulic circuit for restriction or pump fault
4 Review whether maintenance dispatch is warranted
Signals organized Connected-system risk prioritized Verification before action

Without connected-system reasoning, this event may be treated as a local cooling-unit fault, delaying recovery and sending the wrong team first.

Built on operational evidence, not guesswork

01

Traceable sources

Every claim is traceable to the manual section, telemetry field, or incident pattern it drew from.

02

Consistent reasoning

Same inputs produce the same evidence state, reasoning path, and unresolved questions.

03

Connected-system context

Understands system dependencies and propagation paths across interconnected equipment — not only the asset showing the alarm.

04

Builds a feedback loop from reviewed history

Past incidents, work-order resolutions, and operator observations become reusable context after review and sign-off.

05

Verify before action

Veras shows what evidence supports action and what still needs verification. Low confidence becomes a question, not a guess.

06

Human review stays in the loop

Reviewed operational patterns can be reused after operator or supervisor sign-off.

Not a chatbot. Not autonomous. Not a replacement.

Not

A generic chatbot

Every claim is grounded in the team’s operational sources: procedures, telemetry, work history, incidents, and reviewed operator context.

Not

A dynamic SOP

Veras helps teams reason through evidence and context. It does not replace engineering judgment with a fixed decision tree.

Not

A CMMS replacement

Veras helps teams reason through operational evidence. Your existing CMMS manages work orders, asset records, and PM schedules.

Not

Autonomous control

Veras does not actuate equipment or send commands. Operators and supervisors remain responsible for operational decisions.

Not

Predictive maintenance

Veras does not primarily forecast failures. It helps teams reason when uncertainty already exists or weak signals need interpretation.

Not

A recommendation engine

If the evidence does not support a conclusion, Veras surfaces the uncertainty instead of forcing an answer.

Validate Veras on a real recurring operational problem.

We are looking for 2–3 design partners with recurring operational problems where knowledge exists but is difficult to use.

What we need

  • A real recurring operational issue
  • Equipment manuals and procedures related to the issue
  • Work orders and incident reports related to the issue
  • Access to operators, planners, and experts impacted by the issue
Accepting 2–3 design partners

Partners receive free pilot access, input into workflow design, roadmap influence, and preferred commercial terms after successful validation.

Get in touch

hello@getveras.com